Vigour, vigor and vigorous
Waldorf Astoria Hotel
‘Vigour’ means physical strength and general good health, or effort and enthusiasm (see Oxford Dictionaries).
In the UK it is spelt ‘vigour’ and in the US it is spelt ‘vigor’.
The UK spelling of ‘vigour’ leads to the common mistake of spelling ‘vigorous’ with a ‘u’, as in ‘vigourous’. This is wrong, both in the UK and America. You’ll see ‘vigourous’ quite often. Here are just a few examples from a couple of organisations that should know better:
“…and I certainly wouldn’t welcome a widescreen telly or a vigourous game of Scrabble…” (the Guardian)
“The recipe was invented at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York. Vigourous shaking is recommended before the thick, sweet liquid can be strained…” (the Guardian)
“Since then vigourous growth in dental services has led to improved access for patients.” (BBC News website)
Wrong, wrong and wrong. The word, as Oxford Dictionaries will confirm, is ‘vigorous‘.
Similarly, the British spelling of ‘rigour‘ becomes ‘rigorous‘. (The American spelling of ‘rigour’ is ‘rigor’.)
Humour/humorous and glamour/glamorous
More commonly confused words and phrases
Are you looking for an easy-to-understand guide to punctuation, grammar and writing well?
Did you enjoy this post and find it useful? If so, you might like Wordwatch: A Plain Language Guide to Grammar, Punctuation and Writing Well. It includes:
– easy-to-understand explanations of many aspects of grammar and punctuation that commonly cause confusion;
– clear instructions on the correct use of possessive apostrophes, commas, speech marks, hyphens, and semicolons;
– definitions of commonly used foreign words and phrases;
– clear explanations of word classes, including nouns, adjectives and verbs; and
– a brief guide go politically correct writing.
Wordwatch is available as an ebook and in paperback. Buy it from Amazon.com and Amazon UK.
Pronounced in Massachusetts “vig-gah.”
Michael Farrell
19/02/2010 at 3:49 pm
That’s what we have with our fish and chips.
Deborah
19/02/2010 at 3:53 pm
And what about in Canada?
Ou is the only way to go.
westwood
19/02/2010 at 6:36 pm
Fowler’s (3d ed., p. 561) has a very nice entry on -our and -or issues. He points out the many abstract nouns where the UK and US agree on spelling: error, horror, pallor, stupor, terror, tremor, etc. We both use actor, governor, and sailor. No -our endings in ambassador, anchor, bachelor, (my fave) liquor, or mirror. Yet we both use -our in contour, paramour, and a few others.
He notes the gentle trend, esply in Australia and Canada, to drop -our in favor/favour of -or in all cases (or at least to make it optional), then wisely points out what a tumult this would cause in the UK.
Finally, while words like “vigour” lose the U in their adjective forms (vigorous, as above), it gets even more confusing with derivatives of the root. With the endings -ist, -ite, and -able, you’d keep the U: Labourite, colourist. With endings like -ation or -ize, you’d usually lose the U: coloration, invigoration, glamorize, vaporize.
I pity the non-native speaker — and even the native speaker.
Michael Farrell
22/02/2010 at 6:11 pm
Thanks very much for that, Michael — very interesting. And to add to the confusion there’s the fact that in the UK we will often use an ‘ise’ ending instead of ‘ize’. Interestingly, with both the examples you cite above (‘glamorize’and ‘vaporize’) the ‘ise’ ending is given in the Oxford Dictionary of English as an alternative rather than the first choice of spelling. But I think we would ‘ise’ rather than ‘ize’ most of the time — even though the ‘ize’ ending is not, as is commonly assumed, an ‘Americanisation’. Thanks again.
Deborah
22/02/2010 at 8:59 pm
It is incorrect to state that there is a trend in Australia to -or endings. I’ve noticed it sometimes on Canadian sites and newspaper articles, but it is definitely not accepted usage in Australia or New Zealand. I work in a library in Australia, and all the Australian books and newspapers use standard Australian (i.e. British) usage of -our. Also Australia always uses ‘s’ instead of ‘z’ in words such as organise, organisation, computerised, etc, whereas I’ve noticed the British use both spellings (‘organization’ and ‘organisation’), while the Americans always use ‘z’.
This is not to say the American spelling doesn’t occasionally crop up – there’s always a small percentage of people who can’t spell very well. I’ve seen British writers on internet sites using -or spelling such as ‘favorite’ too.
If Fowler’s Modern English says that, it is proof you can’t always trust everything you read in a book & academics are not infallible. Thanks.
Andrew
21/05/2010 at 11:34 am
Hello, Andrew — you’re very welcome to Wordwatch. Thank you very much for taking the time and trouble to post these comments. I am no expert on Australian or New Zealand usage, and was very interested indeed to read this and find out more. Thanks again.
Deborah
21/05/2010 at 11:45 am
Dragon NaturallySpeaking’s Australian dictionary spells rigorous and vigorous as rigourous and vigourous. Thankfully I was able to fix that with its vocabulary editor.
Chris Watkins
24/08/2014 at 2:19 am
Hi – good spot! I’m glad you were able to make the correction. 🙂 It’s a pretty ubiquitous error but seems particularly bad in a dictionary!
Wordwatch
24/08/2014 at 6:43 am
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/vigour
Or perhaps this is another organisation that “should know better”…
Phil Davies
11/10/2017 at 6:32 pm
Hello 🙂
I’m not sure what you mean, but I defend your right to say it as Voltaire may have nearly said.
Wordwatch
18/01/2018 at 7:17 pm